4.7 Article

Testing the distance duality relation with present and future data

Journal

PHYSICAL REVIEW D
Volume 85, Issue 12, Pages -

Publisher

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevD.85.123510

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Italian Space Agency (ASI) [I/031/10/0]
  2. STFC [ST/H002456/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  3. Science and Technology Facilities Council [ST/I003045/1, ST/H002456/1, ST/J001988/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  4. UK Space Agency [ST/J005037/1] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The assumptions that light propagates along null geodesics of the spacetime metric and the number of photons is conserved along the light path lead to the distance duality relation (DDR), eta = D-L(z) x (1 + z)(-2)/D-A(z) = 1, with D-L(z) and D-A(z) the luminosity and angular diameter distances to a source at redshift z. In order to test the DDR, we follow the usual strategy comparing the angular diameter distances of a set of clusters, inferred from x-ray and radio data, with the luminosity distance at the same cluster redshift using the local regression technique to estimate D-L(z) from a type Ia supernovae (SNeIa) Hubble diagram. In order to both strengthen the constraints on the DDR and get rid of the systematics related to the unknown cluster geometry, we also investigate the possibility to use baryon acoustic oscillations (BAO) to infer D-A(z) from future BAO surveys. As a test case, we consider the proposed Euclid mission investigating the precision that can be afforded on eta(z) from the expected SNeIa and BAO data. We find that the combination of BAO and the local regression coupled allows one to reduce the errors on eta(a) = d eta/dz vertical bar(z=0) by a factor 2 if one eta(0) = eta(z = 0) = 1 is forced and future data are used. On the other hand, although the statistical error on eta(0) is not significantly reduced, the constraints on this quantity will be nevertheless ameliorated thanks to the reduce impact of systematics.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available