4.7 Article

Top-pair forward-backward asymmetry beyond next-to-leading order

Journal

PHYSICAL REVIEW D
Volume 84, Issue 7, Pages -

Publisher

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevD.84.074004

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. State of Rhineland-Palatinate via the Research Center Elementary Forces and Mathematical Foundations
  2. German Federal Ministry for Education and Research [05H09UME]
  3. German Research Foundation [NE398/3-1]
  4. European Commission through the LHCPhenoNet Initial Training Network [PITN-GA-2010-264564]
  5. Schweizer Nationalfonds [200020-124773]
  6. National Science Foundation [PHY-1068317]
  7. Swiss National Science Foundation (SNF) [200020_124773] Funding Source: Swiss National Science Foundation (SNF)
  8. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien
  9. Division Of Physics [1068317] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We make use of recent results in effective theory and higher-order perturbative calculations to improve the theoretical predictions of the QCD contribution to the top-quark pair production forward-backward asymmetry at the Tevatron. In particular, we supplement the fixed-order next-to-leading order calculation with higher-order corrections from soft-gluon resummation at next-to next-to-leading order accuracy performed in two different kinematic schemes, which allows us to make improved predictions for the asymmetry in the p (p) over bar and t (t) over bar rest frames as a function of the rapidity and invariant mass of the t (t) over bar pair. Furthermore, we provide binned results which can be compared with the recent measurements of the forward-backward asymmetry in events with a large pair invariant mass or rapidity difference. Finally, we calculate at NLO + NNLL order the top-quark charge asymmetry at the LHC as a function of a lower rapidity cutoff for the top and antitop quarks.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available