4.7 Article

Cosmic string power spectrum, bispectrum, and trispectrum

Journal

PHYSICAL REVIEW D
Volume 82, Issue 6, Pages -

Publisher

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevD.82.063527

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. STFC [ST/F002998/1]
  2. Centre for Theoretical Cosmology
  3. EPSRC
  4. Isaac Newton Trust
  5. Cambridge European Trust
  6. STFC [ST/F002998/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  7. Science and Technology Facilities Council [ST/F002998/1] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We use analytic calculations of the post-recombination gravitational effects of cosmic strings to estimate the resulting CMB power spectrum, bispectrum and trispectrum. We place a particular emphasis on multipole regimes relevant for forthcoming CMB experiments, notably the Planck satellite. These calculations use a flat-sky approximation, generalizing previous work by integrating string contributions from last scattering to the present day, finding the dominant contributions to the correlators for multipoles l > 50. We find a well-behaved shape for the string bispectrum (without divergences) which is easily distinguishable from the inflationary bispectra which possess significant acoustic peaks. We estimate that the nonlinearity parameter characterizing the bispectrum is approximately 0 greater than or similar to f(NL) greater than or similar to -40 (given present string constraints from the CMB power spectrum). We also apply these unequal time correlator methods to calculate the trispectrum for parrallelogram configurations, again valid over a large range of angular scales relevant for WMAP and Planck, as well as on very small angular scales. We find that, unlike the bispectrum which is suppressed by symmetry considerations, the trispectrum for cosmic strings is large. Our current estimate for the trispectrum parameter is tau(NL) similar to 10(5), which may provide one of the strongest constraints on the string model in future analysis.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available