4.5 Article

Production of heavy and superheavy neutron-rich nuclei in transfer reactions

Journal

PHYSICAL REVIEW C
Volume 83, Issue 4, Pages -

Publisher

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevC.83.044618

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. GSI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The problem of production and study of heavy neutron-rich nuclei has been intensively discussed during recent years. Many reasons arouse a great interest in this problem. The present limits of the upper part of the nuclear map are very close to the beta stability line while the unexplored area of heavy neutron-rich nuclides (also those located along the neutron closed shell N = 126 to the right-hand side of the stability line) is extremely important for nuclear astrophysic investigations and, in particular, for the understanding of the r process of astrophysical nucleogenesis. For elements with Z > 100 only neutron deficient isotopes (located to the left of the stability line) have been synthesized so far. The northeast area of the nuclear map can be reached neither in fusion-fission reactions nor in fragmentation processes widely used nowadays for the production of new nuclei. Multinucleon transfer processes in near barrier collisions of heavy (and very heavy, U-like) ions seem to be the only reaction mechanism allowing us to produce and explore neutron-rich heavy nuclei including those located at the superheavy island of stability. In this paper several transfer reactions for different projectile-target combinations are studied in detail. Besides the predictions for the cross sections of such processes, we also analyze the angular and energy distributions of primary and survived reaction products in the laboratory frame. These results, as well as predicted excitation functions for the yields of neutron-rich superheavy isotopes, might be useful for the design of appropriate experimental equipment and for carrying out experiments of such kind.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available