4.5 Article

Magnetic effects in heavy-ion collisions at intermediate energies

Journal

PHYSICAL REVIEW C
Volume 84, Issue 6, Pages -

Publisher

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevC.84.064605

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. NSF [PHY-0757839, PHY-1068022]
  2. NASA through the Science Mission Directorate [NNX11AC41G]
  3. National Natural Science Foundation of China [11005022, 10847004, 11075215]
  4. NASA [NNX11AC41G, 149524] Funding Source: Federal RePORTER

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The time evolution and space distribution of internal electromagnetic fields in heavy-ion reactions at beam energies between 200 and 2000 MeV/nucleon are studied within an isospin-dependent Boltzmann-Uhling-Uhlenbeck transport model (IBUU11). While the magnetic field can reach about 7 x 10(16) G, which is significantly higher than the estimated surface magnetic field (similar to 1 x 10(15) G) of magnetars, it has almost no effect on nucleon observables because the Lorentz force is normally much weaker than the nuclear force. Very interestingly, however, the magnetic field generated by the projectilelike (targetlike) spectator has a strong focusing and defocusing effect on positive and negative pions at forward (backward) rapidities. Consequently, the differential pi(-)/pi(+) ratio as a function of rapidity is significantly altered by the magnetic field, whereas the total multiplicities of both positive and negative pions remain about the same. At beam energies above about 1 GeV/nucleon, while the integrated ratio of total pi(-) to pi(+) multiplicities is not, the differential pi(-)/pi(+) ratio is sensitive to the density dependence of nuclear symmetry energy E-sym(rho). Our findings suggest that magnetic effects should be carefully considered in future studies of using the differential pi(-)/pi(+) ratio as a probe of the E-sym(rho) at suprasaturation densities.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available