- Home
- Publications
- Publication Search
- Publication Details
Title
Green's functions from real-time bold-line Monte Carlo
Authors
Keywords
-
Journal
PHYSICAL REVIEW B
Volume 89, Issue 11, Pages -
Publisher
American Physical Society (APS)
Online
2014-04-01
DOI
10.1103/physrevb.89.115139
References
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.- Spectral analysis by the method of consistent constraints
- (2013) N. V. Prokof’ev et al. JETP LETTERS
- Generalized projected dynamics for non-system observables of non-equilibrium quantum impurity models
- (2013) Guy Cohen et al. NEW JOURNAL OF PHYSICS
- Numerically exact long-time magnetization dynamics at the nonequilibrium Kondo crossover of the Anderson impurity model
- (2013) Guy Cohen et al. PHYSICAL REVIEW B
- Extracting spectral properties from Keldysh Green functions
- (2013) Andreas Dirks et al. PHYSICAL REVIEW E
- Truncated configuration interaction expansions as solvers for correlated quantum impurity models and dynamical mean-field theory
- (2012) Dominika Zgid et al. PHYSICAL REVIEW B
- The ALPS project release 2.0: open source software for strongly correlated systems
- (2011) B Bauer et al. JOURNAL OF STATISTICAL MECHANICS-THEORY AND EXPERIMENT
- Anderson impurity model in nonequilibrium: Analytical results versus quantum Monte Carlo data
- (2011) L. Mühlbacher et al. PHYSICAL REVIEW B
- Numerically exact long-time behavior of nonequilibrium quantum impurity models
- (2011) Emanuel Gull et al. PHYSICAL REVIEW B
- Memory effects in nonequilibrium quantum impurity models
- (2011) Guy Cohen et al. PHYSICAL REVIEW B
- Continuous-time Monte Carlo methods for quantum impurity models
- (2011) Emanuel Gull et al. REVIEWS OF MODERN PHYSICS
- Nonequilibrium dynamical mean-field calculations based on the noncrossing approximation and its generalizations
- (2010) Martin Eckstein et al. PHYSICAL REVIEW B
- Simulation of strongly correlated fermions in two spatial dimensions with fermionic projected entangled-pair states
- (2010) Philippe Corboz et al. PHYSICAL REVIEW B
- Bold-line diagrammatic Monte Carlo method: General formulation and application to expansion around the noncrossing approximation
- (2010) Emanuel Gull et al. PHYSICAL REVIEW B
- Weak-coupling quantum Monte Carlo calculations on the Keldysh contour: Theory and application to the current-voltage characteristics of the Anderson model
- (2010) Philipp Werner et al. PHYSICAL REVIEW B
- Dynamical mean-field theory and numerical renormalization group study of superconductivity in the attractive Hubbard model
- (2009) J. Bauer et al. PHYSICAL REVIEW B
- Diagrammatic Monte Carlo simulation of nonequilibrium systems
- (2009) Philipp Werner et al. PHYSICAL REVIEW B
- Real-time diagrammatic Monte Carlo for nonequilibrium quantum transport
- (2009) Marco Schiró et al. PHYSICAL REVIEW B
- Thermalization after an Interaction Quench in the Hubbard Model
- (2009) Martin Eckstein et al. PHYSICAL REVIEW LETTERS
- Exact dynamics of dissipative electronic systems and quantum transport: Hierarchical equations of motion approach
- (2008) Jinshuang Jin et al. JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL PHYSICS
- Iron-Based Layered Superconductor La[O1-xFx]FeAs (x= 0.05−0.12) withTc= 26 K
- (2008) Yoichi Kamihara et al. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY
- Bold diagrammatic Monte Carlo: A generic sign-problem tolerant technique for polaron models and possibly interacting many-body problems
- (2008) N. V. Prokof’ev et al. PHYSICAL REVIEW B
- Dual fermion approach to nonlocal correlations in the Hubbard model
- (2008) A. N. Rubtsov et al. PHYSICAL REVIEW B
- Real-Time Path Integral Approach to Nonequilibrium Many-Body Quantum Systems
- (2008) Lothar Mühlbacher et al. PHYSICAL REVIEW LETTERS
Publish scientific posters with Peeref
Peeref publishes scientific posters from all research disciplines. Our Diamond Open Access policy means free access to content and no publication fees for authors.
Learn MoreBecome a Peeref-certified reviewer
The Peeref Institute provides free reviewer training that teaches the core competencies of the academic peer review process.
Get Started