4.6 Article

Simulation of uranium dioxide polymorphs and their phase transitions

Journal

PHYSICAL REVIEW B
Volume 88, Issue 21, Pages -

Publisher

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.88.214112

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. European Commission [211690]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this article first-principles DFT calculations and molecular dynamics simulations using empirical potentials have been used to study four different polymorphs of uranium dioxide that appear under high compressive and tensile deformations. It has been found, as expected, that the ground-state structure is the fluorite-type structure (space group Fm (3) over barm). Under high compressive deformation urania transforms into cotunnite-type structure (space group Pnma), as already known experimentally. The calculated transition pressure is 28 GPa in agreement with the experimental data. Under tensile deformation urania transforms into either scrutinyite-type structure (space group Pbcn) or rutile-type (space group P4(2)/mnm) structure. These two phases are almost energetically degenerate; hence it is impossible to distinguish which phase is the most favorable. The transition pressure for both phases is found to be equal to -10 GPa. Subsequently, assessment of four of the most used empirical potentials for UO2-Morelon, Arima, Basak, and Yakub-have been carried out comparing the equations of state with those found with DFT calculations. The Morelon potential has been found to be the most accurate to describe the different urania polymorphs. Using this empirical potential and a dedicated minimization procedure, complete transition pathways between the ground state (Fm (3) over barm) and both tensile structures (Pbcn or P4(2)/mnm) are described. Finally, uniaxial tensile load molecular dynamics simulations have been performed. It has been found that for load in the 100 direction urania transforms into the Pbcn structure while for load in the 110 direction it transits towards the P4(2)/mnm structure.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available