4.6 Article

Real-space imaging of the Verwey transition at the (100) surface of magnetite

Journal

PHYSICAL REVIEW B
Volume 88, Issue 16, Pages -

Publisher

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.88.161410

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Spanish Government [MAT2009-14578-C03-01, MAT2012-38045-C04-01]
  2. Office of Basic Energy Sciences, Division of Materials and Engineering Sciences, US Department of Energy [AC0205CH11231]
  3. Centre for Atomic-Level Catalyst Design, an Energy Frontier Research Centre
  4. US Department of Energy, Office of Science, Office of Basic Energy Sciences [DE-SC0001058]
  5. NSF [DMR-1205469]
  6. Austrian Science Fund [P24925-N20]
  7. Austrian Science Fund (FWF) [P24925] Funding Source: Austrian Science Fund (FWF)
  8. Austrian Science Fund (FWF) [P 24925] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Effects of the Verwey transition on the (100) surface of magnetite were studied using scanning tunneling microscopy and spin polarized low-energy electron microscopy. On cooling through the transition temperature TV, the initially flat surface undergoes a rooflike distortion with a periodicity of similar to 0.5 mu m due to ferroelastic twinning within monoclinic domains of the low-temperature monoclinic structure. The monoclinic c axis orients in the surface plane, along the [001](c) directions. At the atomic scale, the charge-ordered (root 2 x root 2)R45 degrees reconstruction of the (100) surface is unperturbed by the bulk transition, and is continuous over the twin boundaries. Time resolved low-energy electron microscopy movies reveal the structural transition to be first order at the surface, indicating that the bulk transition is not an extension of the Verwey-like (root 2 x root 2)R45 degrees reconstruction. Although conceptually similar, the charge-ordered phases of the (100) surface and sub-T-V bulk of magnetite are unrelated phenomena.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available