4.6 Article

Circular polarization dependent cyclotron resonance in large-area graphene in ultrahigh magnetic fields

Journal

PHYSICAL REVIEW B
Volume 85, Issue 20, Pages -

Publisher

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.85.205407

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Science Foundation [DMR-1006663, DMR-1105437, OISE-0968405, DMR-0654118]
  2. Department of Energy BES [DEFG02-06ER46308]
  3. Robert A. Welch Foundation [C-1509]
  4. State of Florida
  5. Los Alamos National Laboratory
  6. DoD, Air Force Office of Scientific Research, National Defense Science and Engineering Graduate (NDSEG) [32 CFR 168a]
  7. UCOP
  8. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien
  9. Division Of Materials Research [1105437] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  10. Division Of Materials Research
  11. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien [1006663] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  12. Office Of Internatl Science &Engineering
  13. Office Of The Director [968405] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Using ultrahigh magnetic fields up to 170 T and polarized midinfrared radiation with tunable wavelengths from 9.22 to 10.67 mu m, we studied cyclotron resonance in large-area graphene grown by chemical vapor deposition. Circular polarization dependent studies reveal strong p-type doping for as-grown graphene, and the dependence of the cyclotron resonance on radiation wavelength allows for a determination of the Fermi energy. Thermal annealing shifts the Fermi energy to near the Dirac point, resulting in the simultaneous appearance of hole and electron cyclotron resonance in the magnetic quantum limit, even though the sample is still p-type, due to graphene's linear dispersion and unique Landau level structure. These high-field studies therefore allow for a clear identification of cyclotron resonance features in large-area, low-mobility graphene samples.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available