4.6 Article

Phase behavior of PCBM blends with different conjugated polymers

Journal

PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY CHEMICAL PHYSICS
Volume 13, Issue 26, Pages 12285-12292

Publisher

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c0cp02814b

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Institute for the Promotion of Innovation by Science and Technology in Flanders (IWT) [030220]
  2. FWO [G.0091.07]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this work the phase behavior of [6,6]-phenyl C-61-butyric acid methyl ester (PCBM) blends with different poly(phenylene vinylene) (PPV) samples is investigated by means of standard and modulated temperature differential scanning calorimetry (DSC and MTDSC) and rapid heat-cool calorimetry (RHC). The PPV conjugated polymers include poly(2-methoxy-5-(3',7'-dimethyloctyloxy)- 1,4-phenylene vinylene) (MDMO-PPV), High T-g-PPV which is a copolymer, and poly((2-methoxy-5-phenethoxy)-1,4-phenylene vinylene) (MPE-PPV). Comparisons of these PPV: PCBM blends with regioregular poly(3-hexyl thiophene) (P3HT): PCBM blends are made to see the different component miscibilities among different blends. The occurrence of liquid-liquid phase separation in the molten state of MDMO-PPV: PCBM and High T-g-PPV: PCBM blends is indicated by the coexistence of double glass transitions for blends with a PCBM weight fraction of around 80 wt%. This is in contrast to the P3HT: PCBM blends where no phase separation is observed. Due to its high cooling rate (about 2000 K min(-1)), RHC proves to be a useful tool to investigate the phase separation in PPV: PCBM blends through the glass transition of these crystallizable blends. P3HT is found to have much higher thermal stability than the PPV samples.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available