4.6 Article

Prediction of small-for-gestational-age neonates: screening by biophysical and biochemical markers at 19-24 weeks

Journal

ULTRASOUND IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Volume 46, Issue 4, Pages 437-445

Publisher

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1002/uog.14904

Keywords

alpha-fetoprotein; placental growth factor; pre-eclampsia; pyramid of antenatal care; second-trimester screening; small-for-gestational age; uterine artery pulsatility index

Funding

  1. Fetal Medicine Foundation [1037116]
  2. European Union 7th Framework Programme (ASPRE Project) [FP7-HEALTH-2013-INNOVATION-2, 601852]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective To investigate the value of combined screening by maternal characteristics and medical history, fetal biometry and biophysical and biochemical markers at 19-24 weeks' gestation, for prediction of delivery of small-for-gestational-age (SGA) neonates, in the absence of pre-eclampsia (PE), and examine the potential value of such assessment in deciding whether the third-trimester scan should be at 32 and/or 36 weeks' gestation. Methods This was a screening study in 7816 singleton pregnancies, including 389 (5.0%) that delivered SGA neonates with birth weight < 5th percentile (SGA < 5th), in the absence of PE. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was used to determine if screening by a combination of maternal factors, fetal biometry, uterine artery pulsatility index (UtA-PI) and maternal serum concentrations of placental growth factor (PlGF) and a-fetoprotein (AFP) had significant contribution in predicting SGA neonates. A model was developed for selecting the gestational age for third-trimester assessment, at 32 and/or 36 weeks, based on the results of screening at 19-24 weeks. Results Significant independent contributions to the prediction of SGA < 5th were provided by maternal factors, fetal biometry, UtA-PI and serum PlGF and AFP. The detection rate (DR) of such combined screening at 19-24 weeks was 100%, 78% and 42% for SGA < 5th delivering < 32, at 32-36 and >= 37 weeks' gestation, respectively, at a false-positive rate (FPR) of 10%. In a hypothetical model, it was estimated that if the desired objective of prenatal screening is to predict about 80% of the cases of SGA < 5th, it would be necessary to select 11% of the population at the 19-24-week assessment to be reassessed at 32 weeks and 44% to be reassessed at 36 weeks; 57% would not require a third-trimester scan. Conclusion Prenatal prediction of a high proportion of SGA neonates necessitates the undertaking of screening in the third trimester of pregnancy, in addition to assessment in the second trimester, and the timing of such screening, at 32 and/or 36 weeks, should be contingent on the results of the assessment at 19-24 weeks. Copyright (C) 2015 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available