4.7 Review

Role of EGFR mutations in lung cancers: prognosis and tumor chemosensitivity

Journal

ARCHIVES OF TOXICOLOGY
Volume 89, Issue 8, Pages 1227-1240

Publisher

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s00204-015-1524-7

Keywords

Molecular biomarkers; Cytotoxic chemotherapy; Personalized therapy; Acquired resistance; EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor

Categories

Funding

  1. Ministry of Education, Science, Sports, and Culture of Japan [15K18450]
  2. Japan Surgical Society (JSS)
  3. Kaibara Morikazu Medical Science Promotion Foundation
  4. Uehara Memorial Foundation
  5. Takeda Science Foundation
  6. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [15K18450] Funding Source: KAKEN

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Lung cancers with an epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) gene mutation account for similar to 40 % of adenocarcinomas in East Asians and similar to 15 % of those in Caucasians and African Americans, which makes them one of the most common molecularly defined lung cancer subsets. The discriminative clinical and pathological features of lung cancers with EGFR mutations have been intensively studied, and the predictive role of an EGFR mutation for treatment with EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs) is well established. However, controversial issues remain regarding the clinical and therapeutic implications of EGFR mutations in lung cancers. These include the prognostic impact of the EGFR mutation, its predictive implication for successful treatment with anticancer agents other than EGFR-TKIs, appropriate cytotoxic agents for lung cancers with this mutation, and the chemosensitivity of EGFR-mutation-positive lung cancers after acquisition of resistance to EGFR-TKIs. In this review, we discuss these unanswered but important questions, referring to in vitro studies, basic research, retrospective analyses, and the results of phase III clinical trials.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available