4.3 Review

A Matching Algorithm for Detecting Land Use Changes Using Case-Based Reasoning

Journal

PHOTOGRAMMETRIC ENGINEERING AND REMOTE SENSING
Volume 75, Issue 11, Pages 1319-1332

Publisher

AMER SOC PHOTOGRAMMETRY
DOI: 10.14358/PERS.75.11.1319

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Research Grants Council of Hong Kong [HKU 7301/04H]
  2. Key National Natural Science Foundation of China [40830532]
  3. National Outstanding Youth Foundation of China [40525002]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The paper deals with change detection using time series SAR images. SAR provides a unique opportunity for detecting land-use changes within short intervals (e.g., monthly) in tropical and sub-tropical regions with cloud cover. Traditional change detection methods mainly rely on per-pixel spectral information but ignore per-object structural information. In this study, a new method is presented that integrates object-oriented analysis with case-based reasoning (CBR) for change detection. Object-oriented analysis is carried out to retrieve a variety of features, such as tone, shape, texture, area, and context. An incremental segmentation technique is proposed for deriving change objects from multi-temporal Radar:sat images. Feature selection based on genetic algorithms is carried out to determine the optimal set of features for change detection. A CBR matching algorithm is developed to identify the temporal positions and the kind of changes. It is based on the weighted k-Nearest Neighbor classification using an accumulative similarity measure. The comparison of the four combinations of change detection methods, object-based or pixel-based plus case-based or rule-based, is carried out to validate the performance of this proposed method. The analysis shows that this integrated approach has provided an efficient way of detecting fond-use changes at monthly intervals by using multi-temporal SAB images.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available