4.4 Article

Stability of Flavonoids in the Presence of Riboflavin-photogenerated Reactive Oxygen Species: A Kinetic and Mechanistic Study on Quercetin, Morin and Rutin

Journal

PHOTOCHEMISTRY AND PHOTOBIOLOGY
Volume 86, Issue 4, Pages 827-834

Publisher

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1111/j.1751-1097.2010.00754.x

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Cientificas y Tecnicas (CONICET), Argentina
  2. Agencia Nacional de Promocion Cientifica y Tecnologica (ANPCyT), Argentina
  3. Secretarias de Ciencia y Tecnica of the Universidad Nacional de Rio Cuarto (SECyT UNRC), Argentina
  4. Universidad Nacional de San Luis (SECyT UNSL), Argentina

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Kinetic and mechanistic aspects on the stability of the flavones (FL) quercetin (Que), morin (Mor) and rutin (Rut), in methanolic solution and in the presence of reactive oxygen species (ROS) generated by visible light-promoted riboflavin (Rf, vitamin B(2)) photoirradiation were studied. The system was chosen as a model for the evaluation of the in vivo protective effect of biological targets by the flavones. The overall picture includes the vitamin as an endogenous natural photosensitizer. A systematic study on the effect of ROS on FL photostability shows that under work conditions Que is oxidized by singlet molecular oxygen (O(2)(1 Delta(g))), superoxide radical anion (O(2)center dot-) and hydrogen peroxide; Mor is degraded by O(2)(1 Delta(g)) and O(2)center dot- whereas Rut only reacts with O(2)(1 Delta(g)). Que and Rut, with an extremely poor overall rate constant, are mainly physical quenchers of O(2)(1 Delta(g)). Mor, with O(2)(1 Delta(g))-interception ability slightly lower than the recognized synthetic antioxidant trolox (Tx), behaves as a typical sacrificial scavenger provided that ca 80% of the collisions with O(2)(1 Delta(g)) cause its own degradation, whereas this parameter reaches around 50% in the case of Tx.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available