4.4 Article

The mechanism of hyperoside protection of ECV-304 cells against tert-butyl hydroperoxide-induced injury

Journal

PHARMACOLOGY
Volume 82, Issue 2, Pages 105-113

Publisher

KARGER
DOI: 10.1159/000139146

Keywords

hyperoside; ECV-304 cell; antioxidation; tert-butyl hydroperoxide

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The aim of the present study was to investigate the mechanism of hyperoside protecting ECV-304 cells against tert-butyl hydroperoxide (TBHP)-induced injury. ECV-304 cell viability was measured by MTT assay. Cellular morphologic changes were observed using phase contrast microscopy. The genotoxic effects of TBHP and the protective ability of hyperoside were assessed by the Comet test. Lipid peroxidation was measured by HPLC method. The cellular redox status was determined from GSH/GSSG ratios. Apoptosis was detected by terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase-mediated dUTP nick end-labeling (TUNEL) assay. Western blot analysis was used to evaluate the levels of cytochrome c, p53, SIRT1, Bax and Bcl-2 expression. The results showed that 128 mu mol/l hyperoside could effectively protect TBHP-treated ECV-304 cells from death, increase superoxide dismutase activity and significantly decrease malondialdehyde production. Hyperoside was effective in protecting against the induction of oxidized DNA bases and redox state alterations induced by TBHP. Furthermore, the release of proapoptotic cytochrome c from mitochondria was reduced by hyperoside, which increased the expression of antiapoptotic SIRT1 and inhibited the translocation of Bax from cytoplasm to mitochondria. Taken together, these results indicate that hyperoside is effective in protecting against the oxidative damage induced by TBHP. The mechanism of hyperoside protecting against ECV-304 cell apoptosis by TBHP is related with resuming mitochondrial function and regulating the expression of SIRT1 and Bcl-2 family members. Copyright (C) 2008 S. Karger AG, Basel.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available