Journal
PHARMACOEPIDEMIOLOGY AND DRUG SAFETY
Volume 23, Issue 3, Pages 240-250Publisher
WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/pds.3544
Keywords
rosuvastatin; simvastatin; comparative effectiveness; primary prevention; inverse probability of censoring weighting; SNIIRAM (Systeme National d'Information Inter-Regimes de l'Assurance Maladie); pharmacoepidemiology; pharmacoepidemiology
Funding
- French National Health Insurance
Ask authors/readers for more resources
PurposeUsing the French claims database (Systeme National d'Information Inter-Regimes de l'Assurance Maladie) linked to the hospital discharge database (Programme de Medicalisation des Systemes d'Information), this observational study compared the effectiveness of rosuvastatin and simvastatin prescribed at doses with close LDL-cholesterol-lowering potency on all-cause mortality and cardiovascular and cerebrovascular diseases (CCDs) in primary prevention. MethodsThis historical cohort included patients with no prior CCD, aged 40-79years, who initiated statin therapy with rosuvastatin 5mg or simvastatin 20mg in 2008-2009 in general practice. Follow-up started after a 1-year period used to select patients who regularly received the initial treatment. In an intention-to-treat analysis, patients were followed up to December 2011. In a per-protocol analysis, they were censored prematurely when they discontinued their initial treatment. Adjustment for baseline covariates (age, deprivation index, comedications, comorbidities, prior hospital admissions) was carried out by a Cox proportional hazards model. In the per-protocol analysis, estimation was done by inverse probability of censoring weighting using additional time-dependent covariates. Analyses were gender-specific. ResultsA total of 106941 patients initiated statin therapy with rosuvastatin 5mg and 56860 with simvastatin 20mg. Mean follow-up was 35.8months. For both genders and both types of analyses, the difference in incidence rates of mortality and/or CCD between rosuvastatin 5mg and simvastatin 20mg users was not statistically significant after adjustment (e.g., for CCD and/or mortality in men, in intention-to-treat analysis HR=0.94 [95% CI=0.85-1.04], in per-protocol analysis HR=0.98 [0.87-1.10]). ConclusionsThe results of this real-life study based on medico-administrative databases do not support preferential prescription of rosuvastatin compared to simvastatin for primary prevention of CCD. (c) 2013 The Authors. Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available