Cost Effectiveness of a Pharmacist-Led Information Technology Intervention for Reducing Rates of Clinically Important Errors in Medicines Management in General Practices (PINCER)
Published 2014 View Full Article
- Home
- Publications
- Publication Search
- Publication Details
Title
Cost Effectiveness of a Pharmacist-Led Information Technology Intervention for Reducing Rates of Clinically Important Errors in Medicines Management in General Practices (PINCER)
Authors
Keywords
Amiodarone, Medication Error, ACEI Model, Simple Feedback, Reduce Medication Error
Journal
PHARMACOECONOMICS
Volume 32, Issue 6, Pages 573-590
Publisher
Springer Nature
Online
2014-03-18
DOI
10.1007/s40273-014-0148-8
References
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.- Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards (CHEERS) statement
- (2013) Don Husereau et al. BMC Medicine
- Safer primary care for all: a global imperative
- (2013) Aziz Sheikh et al. Lancet Global Health
- VALUING THE ECONOMIC BENEFITS OF COMPLEX INTERVENTIONS: WHEN MAXIMISING HEALTH IS NOT SUFFICIENT
- (2012) Katherine Payne et al. HEALTH ECONOMICS
- A pharmacist-led information technology intervention for medication errors (PINCER): a multicentre, cluster randomised, controlled trial and cost-effectiveness analysis
- (2012) Anthony J Avery et al. LANCET
- The Nine-Year Sustained Cost-Containment Impact of Swiss Pilot Physicians-Pharmacists Quality Circles
- (2010) Anne Niquille et al. ANNALS OF PHARMACOTHERAPY
- Incidence and Predictors of 30-Day Readmission Among Patients Hospitalized for Advanced Liver Disease
- (2010) Kenneth Berman et al. Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology
- Ten-year trends in hospital admissions for adverse drug reactions in England 1999–2009
- (2010) Tai-Yin Wu et al. JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY OF MEDICINE
- Erratum to: Protocol for the PINCER trial: a cluster randomised trial comparing the effectiveness of a pharmacist-led IT-based intervention with simple feedback in reducing rates of clinically important errors in medicines management in general practices
- (2010) Anthony J Avery et al. Trials
- Therapeutic Drug Monitoring of Lithium in Patients With Bipolar Affective Disorder: Experiences From a Tertiary Care Hospital in India
- (2009) Sangeeta Sharma et al. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF THERAPEUTICS
- Quality of medication use in primary care - mapping the problem, working to a solution: a systematic review of the literature
- (2009) Sara Garfield et al. BMC Medicine
- Incidence of risk factors for developing hyperkalemia when using ACE inhibitors in cardiovascular diseases
- (2009) Omalhassan Amir et al. PHARMACY WORLD & SCIENCE
- Protocol for the PINCER trial: a cluster randomised trial comparing the effectiveness of a pharmacist-led IT-based intervention with simple feedback in reducing rates of clinically important errors in medicines management in general practices
- (2009) Anthony J Avery et al. Trials
- Diagnosis and management of amiodarone-induced thyrotoxicosis: similarities and differences between North American and European thyroidologists*
- (2008) Maria Laura Tanda et al. CLINICAL ENDOCRINOLOGY
- Cardiovascular Risk Factors and Incident Acute Renal Failure in Older Adults: The Cardiovascular Health Study
- (2008) A. Mittalhenkle et al. Clinical Journal of the American Society of Nephrology
- Amiodarone-Induced Thyrotoxicosis Is a Predictor of Adverse Cardiovascular Outcome
- (2008) Kai-Hang Yiu et al. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM
- Systematic Review: Health-State Utilities in Liver Disease: A Systematic Review
- (2008) David J. McLernon et al. MEDICAL DECISION MAKING
- The NICE Cost-Effectiveness Threshold
- (2008) Christopher McCabe et al. PHARMACOECONOMICS
- British Guideline on the Management of Asthma
- (2008) THORAX
Add your recorded webinar
Do you already have a recorded webinar? Grow your audience and get more views by easily listing your recording on Peeref.
Upload NowBecome a Peeref-certified reviewer
The Peeref Institute provides free reviewer training that teaches the core competencies of the academic peer review process.
Get Started