Cost-Effectiveness Analyses in Multiple Sclerosis: A Review of Modelling Approaches
Published 2014 View Full Article
- Home
- Publications
- Publication Search
- Publication Details
Title
Cost-Effectiveness Analyses in Multiple Sclerosis: A Review of Modelling Approaches
Authors
Keywords
Multiple Sclerosis, Multiple Sclerosis Patient, Expand Disability Status Scale, Natalizumab, Glatiramer Acetate
Journal
PHARMACOECONOMICS
Volume 32, Issue 6, Pages 559-572
Publisher
Springer Nature
Online
2014-03-18
DOI
10.1007/s40273-014-0150-1
References
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.- The Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative: A review of papers published since its inception
- (2013) Michael W. Weiner et al. Alzheimers & Dementia
- Daclizumab high-yield process in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (SELECT): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial
- (2013) Ralf Gold et al. LANCET
- Modelling the Cost Effectiveness of Disease-Modifying Treatments for Multiple Sclerosis
- (2013) Joel P. Thompson et al. PHARMACOECONOMICS
- Demystifying trial networks and network meta-analysis
- (2013) E. J. Mills et al. BMJ-British Medical Journal
- Alemtuzumab in multiple sclerosis: latest evidence and clinical prospects
- (2013) Onajite Kousin-Ezewu et al. Therapeutic Advances in Chronic Disease
- Squinting Through Layers of Fog: Assessing the Cost Effectiveness of Treatments for Multiple Sclerosis
- (2013) Annie Hawton et al. Applied Health Economics and Health Policy
- Cost-Effectiveness of Early Initiation of Fingolimod Versus Delayed Initiation After 1 Year of Intramuscular Interferon Beta-1a in Patients with Multiple Sclerosis
- (2012) Neetu Agashivala et al. CLINICAL THERAPEUTICS
- Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Interferon Beta-1b for the Treatment of Patients With a First Clinical Event Suggestive of Multiple Sclerosis
- (2012) John P. Caloyeras et al. CLINICAL THERAPEUTICS
- Long-Term Cost-Effectiveness Model of Interferon Beta-1b in the Early Treatment of Multiple Sclerosis in the United States
- (2012) Feng Pan et al. CLINICAL THERAPEUTICS
- Modeling using Discrete Event Simulation: A Report of the ISPOR-SMDM Modeling Good Research Practices Task Force-4
- (2012) Jonathan Karnon et al. VALUE IN HEALTH
- Model Transparency and Validation: A Report of the ISPOR-SMDM Modeling Good Research Practices Task Force-7
- (2012) David M. Eddy et al. VALUE IN HEALTH
- Cost-effectiveness of fingolimod versus interferon beta-1a for relapsing remitting multiple sclerosis in the United States
- (2012) Soyon Lee et al. JOURNAL OF MEDICAL ECONOMICS
- Cost-effectiveness analysis of disease modifiying drugs (interferons and glatiramer acetate) as first line treatments in remitting-relapsing multiple sclerosis patients
- (2012) Rainel Sánchez-de la Rosa et al. JOURNAL OF MEDICAL ECONOMICS
- Cost effectiveness of glatiramer acetate and natalizumab in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis
- (2012) Stephanie R. Earnshaw et al. Applied Health Economics and Health Policy
- Comparative efficacy of nilotinib and dasatinib in newly diagnosed chronic myeloid leukemia: a matching-adjusted indirect comparison of randomized trials
- (2011) James E. Signorovitch et al. CURRENT MEDICAL RESEARCH AND OPINION
- Cost-effectiveness of disease-modifying therapy for multiple sclerosis: A population-based study
- (2011) K. Noyes et al. NEUROLOGY
- Cost-effectiveness of natalizumab versus fingolimod for the treatment of relapsing multiple sclerosis
- (2011) Ken O’Day et al. JOURNAL OF MEDICAL ECONOMICS
- A health-economic evaluation of disease-modifying drugs for the treatment of relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis from the German societal perspective
- (2010) Mark Nuijten et al. CLINICAL THERAPEUTICS
- New perspectives in the natural history of multiple sclerosis
- (2010) H. Tremlett et al. NEUROLOGY
- No Head-to-Head Trial? Simulate the Missing Arms
- (2010) J. Jaime Caro et al. PHARMACOECONOMICS
- Cost-effectiveness of four immunomodulatory therapies for relapsingremitting multiple sclerosis: A Markov model based on data a Balkan country in socioeconomic transition
- (2010) Slobodan Jankovic et al. Vojnosanitetski Pregled
- The Multiple Sclerosis Risk Sharing Scheme Monitoring Study – early results and lessons for the future
- (2009) Mark Pickin et al. BMC Neurology
- Autologous haematopoietic stem cell transplantation for secondary progressive multiple sclerosis: an exploratory cost-effectiveness analysis
- (2009) P Tappenden et al. BONE MARROW TRANSPLANTATION
- Cost effectiveness and budget impact of natalizumab in patients with relapsing multiple sclerosis
- (2009) Evelyn Chiao et al. CURRENT MEDICAL RESEARCH AND OPINION
- Economic evaluation of treating clinically isolated syndrome and subsequent multiple sclerosis with interferon β-1b
- (2009) Carlo Lazzaro et al. NEUROLOGICAL SCIENCES
- Cost-Effectiveness Analyses of Natalizumab (Tysabri®) Compared with Other Disease-Modifying Therapies for People with Highly Active Relapsing-Remitting Multiple Sclerosis in the UK
- (2009) Ray Gani et al. PHARMACOECONOMICS
- Treating Relapsing Multiple Sclerosis with Subcutaneous versus Intramuscular Interferon-Beta-1a
- (2009) Shien Guo et al. PHARMACOECONOMICS
- Cost-Effectiveness of Disease-Modifying Therapies in the Management of Multiple Sclerosis for the Medicare Population
- (2009) Paul Tappenden et al. VALUE IN HEALTH
- The cost effectiveness and budget impact of natalizumab for formulary inclusion
- (2009) Justin Bakhshai et al. JOURNAL OF MEDICAL ECONOMICS
- Multiple sclerosis
- (2008) Alastair Compston et al. LANCET
- Modeling the cost-effectiveness of a new treatment for MS (natalizumab) compared with current standard practice in Sweden
- (2008) G Kobelt et al. Multiple Sclerosis Journal
- Use of Indirect and Mixed Treatment Comparisons for Technology Assessment
- (2008) Alex Sutton et al. PHARMACOECONOMICS
Create your own webinar
Interested in hosting your own webinar? Check the schedule and propose your idea to the Peeref Content Team.
Create NowAsk a Question. Answer a Question.
Quickly pose questions to the entire community. Debate answers and get clarity on the most important issues facing researchers.
Get Started