4.6 Article

Corrections for downhole NMR logging

Journal

PETROLEUM SCIENCE
Volume 9, Issue 1, Pages 46-52

Publisher

SPRINGEROPEN
DOI: 10.1007/s12182-012-0181-1

Keywords

NMR logging; finite element method; RF field; NMR signal; formation resistivity; sodium ions

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [41074102]
  2. China International Science and Technology Cooperation [2009DFA61030]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Nuclear magnetic resonance logging (NMR) is an open well logging method. Drilling mud resistivity, formation resistivity and sodium ions influence its radio frequency (RF) field strength and NMR logging signals. Research on these effects can provide an important basis for NMR logging data acquisition and interpretation. Three models, water-based drilling mud-water bearing formation, water-based drilling mud-oil bearing formation, oil-based drilling mud-water bearing formation, were studied by finite element method numerical simulation. The influences of drilling mud resistivity and formation resistivity on the NMR logging tool RF field and the influences of sodium ions on the NMR logging signals were simulated numerically. On the basis of analysis, RF field correction and sodium ion correction formulae were proposed and their application range was also discussed. The results indicate that when drilling mud resistivity and formation resistivity are 0.02 Omega center dot m and 0.2 Omega center dot m respectively, the attenuation index of centric NMR logging tool is 8.9% and 9.47% respectively. The RF field of an eccentric NMR logging tool is affected mainly by formation resistivity. When formation resistivity is 0.1 Omega center dot m, the attenuation index is 17.5%. For centric NMR logging tools, the signals coming from sodium ions can be up to 31.8% of total signal. Suggestions are proposed for further research into NMR logging tool correction method and response characteristics.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available