4.7 Article

The stability and biochemical basis of fufenozide resistance in a laboratory-selected strain of Plutella xylostella

Journal

PESTICIDE BIOCHEMISTRY AND PHYSIOLOGY
Volume 101, Issue 2, Pages 80-85

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.pestbp.2011.08.003

Keywords

Plutella xylostella; Fufenozide; Resistance-stability; Fitness cost; Enzyme assay

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [30971941, 30671389, 30300232]
  2. Special Fund for Agro-scientific Research in the Public Interest [201103021]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Fufenozide, a novel non-steroidal ecdysone agonist, exhibits good efficacy and plays an important role in controlling lepidopteran pests in China. A high level of resistance to fufenozide (320.3-fold) in Plutella xylostella (L.) has been selected under laboratory conditions. In this study, the stability and biochemical basis of resistance to fufenozide were investigated. The resistance ratio to fufezonide declined substantially from 320.3- to 20.5-fold in the fufenozide resistant strain (JSR) when the selection pressure was removed for six consecutive generations. However, the susceptibility to fufezonide could not be fully restored after 28 generations without exposure to the compound. Increased relative fitness (0.87) was associated with the rapid reversal of resistance in the resistance decaying strain (JSRD). The enzymatic analyses showed reduced specific activities of monooxygenase (MO), glutathione S-transferases (GSTs), carboxylesterase and aryl-acylamidase in the JSRD strain, whereas the activity of chitinase increased. The current findings suggest the selected resistance to fufenozide in P. xylostella is not stable, and the four detoxifying enzymes including MO, GSTs, carboxylesterase, and aryl-acylamidase may be involved. For resistance management proposes, insecticide rotation should be a viable option to delay the occurrence of fufenozide resistance in the field. (C) 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available