4.7 Article

Toxicity and biochemical study of two insect growth regulators, buprofezin and pyriproxyfen, on cotton leafworm Spodoptera littoralis

Journal

PESTICIDE BIOCHEMISTRY AND PHYSIOLOGY
Volume 98, Issue 2, Pages 198-205

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.pestbp.2010.06.007

Keywords

Insect growth regulators; Buprofezin; Pyriproxyfen; Spodoptera littoralis; Chitinase; PPO

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Lethal and sublethal effects of two insect growth regulators (IGRs) buprofezin and pyriproxyfen were evaluated on larvae of cotton leafworm Spodoptera littoralis. Activity of chitinase and polyphenol oxidase (PPO) in surviving larvae after treatment was carried out in order to investigate the biochemical influences of these compounds. The compounds were low toxic against the larvae at 0.05, 0.1, 0.25, 0.5, and 1.0-fold of the field application rate. However, the overall mortalities within 6 days of feeding at 2.0-fold were 46.67% and 100% for buprofezin and pyriproxyfen, respectively. Larval weight gain was considerably decreased as concentration increased. Pyriproxyfen showed high antifeedant activity in a concentration-dependent manner, and larvae stopped to eat from the third day with high dose. Conversely, buprofezin did not significantly show antifeedant except with high concentration (3000 mg (a.i.)/kg diet) that gave 80.68%. The high doses of both compounds showed adverse effects on pupae, and emergence of adults. Buprofezin at the recommended dose (1500 mg (a.i.)/kg diet) caused 93.33% pupation and 53.33% emergence of adults. Otherwise, pyriproxyfen caused 21.33% pupation and zere emergence of adults at the recommended dose (75 mg (a.i.)/kg diet) compared to 100% pupation, and 96.30% emergence of adults in the control. Both compounds varied in their influences on chitinase and PPO activity, and these enzymes could have relation with toxicity of buprofezin and pyriproxyfen against S. littoralis larvae. (C) 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available