4.7 Article

Fenoxaprop-ethyl affects mouse oocyte quality and the underlying mechanisms

Journal

PEST MANAGEMENT SCIENCE
Volume 75, Issue 3, Pages 844-851

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/ps.5190

Keywords

fenoxaprop-ethyl; cytoskeleton; mitochondrial dysfunction; epigenetic modifications

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31571550]
  2. High-level Personnel Scientific Research Fund of Qingdao Agricultural University [6631115025, 6651117004]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

BACKGROUND Fenoxaprop-ethyl (FE) is an active ingredient of commercially available herbicide formulations. Its overuse has caused much damage to the environment, livestock breeding, agricultural crops and humans. However, little is known about the effects of FE exposure on female reproductive health and the mechanisms underlying those effects. In this study, we investigated the toxic effects of FE on oocyte quality and their underlying mechanisms in mice fed a diet containing FE. RESULTS Ovary weight and numbers of oocytes were reduced in FE-treated mice. Moreover, oocyte quality was seriously impaired, as shown by the reduced rate of first polar body extrusion and fertilization ability in vivo. In FE-treated mice, oocytes presented reduced actin expression and abnormal meiotic spindle morphology, which indicate that cytoskeletal integrality is disrupted. Also, FE induced mitochondrial dysfunction, reflected by the accumulation of reactive oxygen species (ROS), apoptosis and autophagy, as revealed by fluorescent staining analysis and real-time polymerase chain reaction (qPCR). Finally, FE led to changes in epigenetic modifications such as histone H3K27me3 and H3K9me2 in oocytes. CONCLUSIONS Our results indicate that FE has adverse effects on oocyte quality as assessed by maturation and fertilization potential, due to disrupted cytoskeletal integrality, and mitochondrial dysfunction leading to ROS accumulation, apoptosis and autophagy. (c) 2018 Society of Chemical Industry

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available