4.6 Article

Quantitative modeling of clinical, cellular, and extracellular matrix variables suggest prognostic indicators in cancer: a model in neuroblastoma

Journal

PEDIATRIC RESEARCH
Volume 75, Issue 2, Pages 302-314

Publisher

SPRINGERNATURE
DOI: 10.1038/pr.2013.217

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. Fundacion Asociacion Espanola contra el Cancer
  2. FIS [PI10/15]
  3. RTICC (Red Tematica de Investigacion Cooperativa en Cancer [RD06/0020/0102, RD12/0036/0020]
  4. Instituto Carlos III Madrid & ERDF (European Regional Development Fund), Spain

Ask authors/readers for more resources

BACKGROUND: Risk classification and treatment stratification for cancer patients is restricted by our incomplete picture of the complex and unknown interactions between the patient's organism and tumor tissues (transformed cells supported by tumor stroma). Moreover, all clinical factors and laboratory studies used to indicate treatment effectiveness and outcomes are by their nature a simplification of the biological system of cancer, and cannot yet incorporate all possible prognostic indicators. METHODS: A multiparametric analysis on 184 tumor cylinders was performed. To highlight the benefit of integrating digitized medical imaging into this field, we present the results of computational studies carried out on quantitative measurements, taken from stromal and cancer cells and various extracellular matrix fibers interpenetrated by glycosaminoglycans, and eight current approaches to risk stratification systems in patients with primary and nonprimary neuroblastoma. RESULTS: New tumor tissue indicators from both fields, the cellular and the extracellular elements, emerge as reliable prognostic markers for risk stratification and could be used as molecular targets of specific therapies. CONCLUSION: The key to dealing with personalized therapy lies in the mathematical modeling. The use of bioinformatics in patient-tumor-microenvironment data management allows a predictive model in neuroblastoma.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available