4.6 Article

Development of monocyte Toll-like receptor 2 and Toll-like receptor 4 in preterm newborns during the first few months of life

Journal

PEDIATRIC RESEARCH
Volume 73, Issue 5, Pages 685-691

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/pr.2013.36

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. National Science Council of Taiwan [NSC 98-2320-B-010-016-MY3]
  2. Institute of Medical Research of the Cathay General Hospital [MR9514]
  3. Ministry of Education, Aim for the Top University Plan, Taiwan

Ask authors/readers for more resources

BACKGROUND: Although the immaturity of Toll-like receptor 2 (TLR2) and Toll-like receptor 4 (TLR4) at birth in preterm newborns is known, their development during the first few months of life remains unclear. METHODS: Blood monocytes of preterm newborns (gestational age: 24-36 wk) were obtained every 2 wk when possible in order to perform serial measurements of TLR2 and TLR4 surface expression, as well as lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-induced cytokine production. Measurements using monocytes from term newborns and adults were also performed. RESULTS: The monocytes of preterm newborns obtained at birth displayed reduced surface expression of TLR2 and TLR4, and diminished responses of tumor necrosis factor-alpha (INF-alpha) and interleukin (IL)-8 to [PS stimulation. Regardless of gestational age, monocyte expression of TLR2 and TLR4 in preterm newborns increased rapidly within the first 2 wk after birth, quickly reaching those of term newborns. These increases continued for the following 4-6 wk, although the increase began to plateau. By contrast, [PS-induced production of INF-a and IL-8 did not elevate over this period in preterm newborns. CONCLUSION: The blood monocytes of preterm newborns display rapid increase in TLR2 and TLR4 expression during the first few months of life, whereas LPS-induced cytokine production functionality did not improve in parallel.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available