4.6 Article

Mechanism of Reduced Lung Injury by High-Frequency Nasal Ventilation in a Preterm Lamb Model of Neonatal Chronic Lung Disease

Journal

PEDIATRIC RESEARCH
Volume 70, Issue 5, Pages 462-466

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1203/PDR.0b013e31822f58a1

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. NIH [HL75405, HD51857, HD058948, HL55268, HL62875]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The mechanism underlying the potentially beneficial effects of the gentler modes of ventilation on chronic lung disease (CLD) of the premature infant is not known. We have previously demonstrated that alveolar parathyroid hormone-related protein-peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma (PTHrP-PPAR gamma) signaling is critically important in alveolar formation, and this signaling pathway is disrupted in hyperoxia- and/or volutrauma-induced neonatal rat lung injury. Whether the same paradigm is also applicable to CLD, resulting from prolonged intermittent mandatory ventilation (IMV), and whether differential effects of the mode of ventilation on the PTHrP-PPAR gamma signaling pathway explain the potential benefits of the gentler modes of ventilation are not known. Using a well-established preterm lamb model of neonatal CLD, we tested the hypothesis that ventilatory support using high-frequency nasal ventilation (HFNV) promotes alveolar PTHrP-PPAR gamma signaling, whereas IMV inhibits it. Preterm lambs managed by HFNV or IMV for 21 d following preterm delivery at 132-d gestation were studied by Western hybridization and immunofluorescence labeling for key markers of alveolar homeostasis and injury/repair. In lambs managed by IMV, the abundance of key homeostatic alveolar epithelial-mesenchymal markers was reduced, whereas it was significantly increased in the HFNV group, providing a potential molecular mechanism by which gentler modes of ventilation reduce neonatal CLD. (Pediatr Res 70: 462-466, 2011)

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available