4.4 Article

The Effect of High Flow Nasal Cannula Therapy on the Work of Breathing in Infants with Bronchiolitis

Journal

PEDIATRIC PULMONOLOGY
Volume 50, Issue 7, Pages 713-720

Publisher

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1002/ppul.23060

Keywords

oxygen therapy; breathing pattern; respiratory distress; electrical activity of the diaphragm; esophageal pressure; end expiratory level

Funding

  1. Preston James Fund
  2. Bowenville Ladies Auxiliary (Orange Tie Fund)
  3. Mater Children's Hospital Golden Casket
  4. Fisher and Paykel Healthcare
  5. Maquet

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The main physiological impact of high flow nasal cannula (HFNC) therapy is presumed to be a decrease in work of breathing (WOB). To assess this, diaphragmatic electrical activity and esophageal pressure changes were measured off then on HFNC delivered at 2 L/kg/min, in 14 infants with bronchiolitis and 14 cardiac infants. Electrical activity of the diaphragm (Edi) was measured using an Edi catheter with calculations of signal peak (EdiMAX) and amplitude (EdiAMPL). Pressure-rate and pressure-time products (PRP, PTP) were calculated from analyses of esophageal pressure. Changes in end-expiratory lung volume were measured using respiratory inductance plethysmography (RIPEEL). The EdiMAX and EdiAMPLwere significantly higher in infants with bronchiolitis than in cardiac infants (P < 0.05). Within the bronchiolitis group, both were significantly reduced between HFNC states from 27.9mV [20.4, 35.4] to 21.0mV [14.8, 27.2] and from 25.1mV [18.0, 32.2] to 19.2mV [13.3, 25.1], respectively (mean, 95% CI, P < 0.05). A less prominent offload of the diaphragm was observed in cardiac infants (P < 0.05). WOB decreased in both groups with a significant reduction of PRP and PTP (P < 0.05). RIPEEL increased significantly in bronchiolitis only (P < 0.05). HFNC offloads the diaphragm and reduces the WOB in bronchiolitis. A similar effect was demonstrated in cardiac infants, a group without signs of airway-obstruction. (C) 2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available