4.4 Article

Morbidity in children with frequently relapsing nephrosis: 10-year follow-up of a randomized controlled trial

Journal

PEDIATRIC NEPHROLOGY
Volume 30, Issue 3, Pages 459-468

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00467-014-2955-8

Keywords

Children; Follow-up; Long-term; Nephrotic syndrome; Randomized; Controlled trial; Non-remission

Funding

  1. Kidney Foundation, Japan
  2. Novartis Pharma K.K.
  3. Asahi Kasei Pharma Corporation
  4. Astellas Pharma
  5. Terumo Medical Corporation
  6. Chugai Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd.
  7. Pfizer Japan
  8. Takeda Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.
  9. Novartis Pharma

Ask authors/readers for more resources

To investigate the long-term outcome in children with frequently relapsing nephrotic syndrome (FRNS) we conducted a follow-up of a previous randomized controlled trial (RCT) 10 years after the initiation of the treatment protocol. We previously conducted an RCT on the efficacy of cyclosporine for treating children with FRNS. After 2 years of treatment, a recommended a management protocol of steroids, and immunosuppressants was provided. Valid information was available for 46 of the 56 patients (82.1 %) enrolled in the original RCT. The median follow-up period was 10.3 years from the start of protocol treatment with cyclosporine. At last follow-up (mean age 18.7 years), only ten patients (21.7 %) showed disease-free remission (no relapse for at least 2 years). In contrast, 23 (50.0 %) continued to relapse frequently or were on immunosuppressants, eight patients (17.4 %) had infrequent relapses without immunosuppressants. Adverse effects attributable to treatment included short stature (6 patients), osteoporosis (six patients), obesity (4 patients), cataracts (3 patients) and hypertension (3 patients). No lethal event or renal dysfunction occurred during follow-up. This 10-year follow-up study shows that most children with FRNS experience relapses after 2 years of cyclosporine treatment, in adolescence and into adulthood. Outcomes in terms of life expectancy and renal function are favorable.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available