4.1 Article

Oxaliplatin and Doxorubicin for Relapsed or Refractory High-Risk Neuroblastoma

Journal

PEDIATRIC HEMATOLOGY AND ONCOLOGY
Volume 32, Issue 1, Pages 26-31

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
DOI: 10.3109/08880018.2014.983624

Keywords

Chemotherapy; doxorubicin; neuroblastoma; oxaliplatin; pediatric oncology

Funding

  1. Children's Hospital Los Angeles Clinical Translational Science Institute, National Center for Research Resources (NCRR), NIH [1UL1RR031986]
  2. University of Southern California Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center from the National Cancer Institute [P30CA014089]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Patients with relapsed or refractory neuroblastoma have poor long-term survival. New therapeutic regimens are needed. Doxorubicin and cisplatin are commonly used in the treatment of high-risk neuroblastoma. Oxaliplatin, a platinum compound with a 1,2-diaminocyclohexan carrier ligand, is more potent than cisplatin with less nephrotoxicity and ototoxicity. We treated seven relapsed/refractory neuroblastoma patients using oxaliplatin (105-130 mg/m(2)) and doxorubicin (60-75 mg/m(2)) together with dexrazoxane (10 mg/mg of doxorubicin) administered intravenously every three weeks. Prolonged thrombocytopenia causing treatment delay was observed when oxaliplatin was administered at 130mg/m(2). A reduced dose of oxaliplatin 105 mg/m(2) on day 1 with doxorubicin at 20mg/m(2)/dose on days 1-3 was well tolerated. Sensory neuropathies were mild and transient. No cardiotoxicity was noted despite all patients having a history of prior anthracycline exposure. Best responses included 1 complete response, 1 partial response, 1 mixed response, 3 stable diseases. In our cohort of heavily pretreated relapsed and refractory neuroblastoma patients, the combination of oxaliplatin and doxorubicin demonstrated anti-tumor activity and merits further investigation.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available