4.1 Article

Clinical Features and Prognostic Significance of TCF3-PBX1 Fusion Gene in Chinese Children with Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia by Using a Modified ALL-BFM-95 Protocol

Journal

PEDIATRIC HEMATOLOGY AND ONCOLOGY
Volume 32, Issue 3, Pages 173-181

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
DOI: 10.3109/08880018.2014.983625

Keywords

acute lymphoblastic leukemia; children; TCF3-PBX1 fusion gene; intensive chemotherapy; prognosis

Funding

  1. National Committee of Public Health and Family Planning Program [W201301]
  2. Basic Research for National Natural Science Foundation in Soochow University [SDY2012B30]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

For children with precursor B (pre-B) acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) with TCF3-PBX1 fusion gene, their prognosis has been a controversial topic. From January 2008 to December 2012 in our hospital, 450 patients were diagnosed as ALL. Clinical characteristics of 20 patients with TCF3-PBX1 fusion gene were analyzed retrospectively, which were classified to the intermediate-risk (IR) group according to Chinese Children Leukemia Group-2008 (CCLG-2008) risk-stratification criteria and protocol based on the backbone of BFM 95 trails. Eighty five cases without TCF3-PBX1 in the same IR group were regarded as the comparison group. There were no differences in age, gender, initial white blood cell (WBC) count, status of central nerves system (CNS) at diagnosis and complete remission (CR) rates of bone marrow (BM) between the two groups (P > .05). The 5-year probability of event-free survival (EFS) rates were 84.4 +/- 15.6% and 73.5 +/- 15.6% in the TCF3-PBX1 group and the comparison group (P =.35), respectively. The 5-year probability of overall survival (OS) rates were 86.0 +/- 17.6% and 81.8 +/- 17.6% (P = .46), respectively. Relapse rates were 10.5% and 12.9% (P = 1.00), respectively. There were not cases with CNS relapse in the TCF3-PBX1 group. When intensive chemotherapy was used, the TCF3-PBX1 was associated with a favorable outcome in childhood pre-B ALL.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available