Surgical Volume-to-Outcome Relationship and Monitoring of Technical Performance in Pediatric Cardiac Surgery
Published 2014 View Full Article
- Home
- Publications
- Publication Search
- Publication Details
Title
Surgical Volume-to-Outcome Relationship and Monitoring of Technical Performance in Pediatric Cardiac Surgery
Authors
Keywords
Norwood procedure, Outcome, Pediatric cardiac surgery, Quality assessment, Surgical volume
Journal
PEDIATRIC CARDIOLOGY
Volume 35, Issue 6, Pages 899-905
Publisher
Springer Nature
Online
2014-06-03
DOI
10.1007/s00246-014-0938-y
References
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.- Surgical Volume and Center Effects on Early Mortality After Pediatric Cardiac Surgery: 25-Year North American Experience From a Multi-institutional Registry
- (2013) Jeffrey M. Vinocur et al. PEDIATRIC CARDIOLOGY
- Institutional Factors Beyond Procedural Volume Significantly Impact Center Variability in Outcomes After Orthotopic Heart Transplantation
- (2012) Arman Kilic et al. ANNALS OF SURGERY
- Invited Commentary
- (2012) Emile Bacha ANNALS OF THORACIC SURGERY
- Invited Commentary
- (2012) Ralph S. Mosca ANNALS OF THORACIC SURGERY
- Relative Impact of Surgeon and Center Volume on Early Mortality After the Norwood Operation
- (2012) Christoph P. Hornik et al. ANNALS OF THORACIC SURGERY
- Congenital heart surgeon's technical proficiency affects neonatal hospital survival
- (2012) Jeffrey Shuhaiber et al. JOURNAL OF THORACIC AND CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY
- Intermediate-term mortality and cardiac transplantation in infants with single-ventricle lesions: Risk factors and their interaction with shunt type
- (2012) James S. Tweddell et al. JOURNAL OF THORACIC AND CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY
- Surgical technical performance scores are predictors of late mortality and unplanned reinterventions in infants after cardiac surgery
- (2012) Meena Nathan et al. JOURNAL OF THORACIC AND CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY
- Association of Center Volume With Mortality and Complications in Pediatric Heart Surgery
- (2012) S. K. Pasquali et al. PEDIATRICS
- The Complex Relationship Between Center Volume and Outcome in Patients Undergoing the Norwood Operation
- (2011) Sara K. Pasquali et al. ANNALS OF THORACIC SURGERY
- Impact of prior hospital mortality versus surgical volume on mortality following surgery for congenital heart disease
- (2011) Matthew E. Oster et al. JOURNAL OF THORACIC AND CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY
- Outcome Analysis for a Small, Start-up Congenital Heart Surgery Program
- (2010) Richard D. Mainwaring et al. JOURNAL OF CARDIAC SURGERY
- Stage I Norwood: Optimal technical performance improves outcomes irrespective of preoperative physiologic status or case complexity
- (2010) John M. Karamichalis et al. JOURNAL OF THORACIC AND CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY
- Surgeon case volume, not institution case volume, is the primary determinant of in-hospital mortality after elective open abdominal aortic aneurysm repair
- (2010) James T. McPhee et al. JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY
- The complex relationship between pediatric cardiac surgical case volumes and mortality rates in a national clinical database
- (2009) Karl F. Welke et al. JOURNAL OF THORACIC AND CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY
- Lesion-specific outcomes in neonates undergoing congenital heart surgery are related predominantly to patient and management factors rather than institution or surgeon experience: A Congenital Heart Surgeons Society Study
- (2009) Tara Karamlou et al. JOURNAL OF THORACIC AND CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY
- Standardized Management Improves Outcomes after the Norwood Procedure
- (2009) Chandra Srinivasan et al. Congenital Heart Disease
- The Relationship Between Hospital Surgical Case Volumes and Mortality Rates in Pediatric Cardiac Surgery: A National Sample, 1988–2005
- (2008) Karl F. Welke et al. ANNALS OF THORACIC SURGERY
Find the ideal target journal for your manuscript
Explore over 38,000 international journals covering a vast array of academic fields.
SearchAsk a Question. Answer a Question.
Quickly pose questions to the entire community. Debate answers and get clarity on the most important issues facing researchers.
Get Started