4.5 Review

Modern management of primary B-cell immunodeficiencies

Journal

PEDIATRIC ALLERGY AND IMMUNOLOGY
Volume 22, Issue 8, Pages 758-769

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1399-3038.2011.01236.x

Keywords

B cell immunodeficiencies; agammaglobulinaemia; class switch recombination defects; hyper IgM syndromes; common variable immunodeficiency; immunoglobulin substitution; IVIg; SCIg; Modern Management B cell defects

Funding

  1. Gebert Ruf Stiftung

Ask authors/readers for more resources

B-cell defects constitute the majority of primary immunodeficiencies. Although a heterogeneous group of diseases, all are characterized by the reduction in or absence of immunoglobulins and/or specific antimicrobial antibodies. Substitution of immunoglobulin G (IgG) is therefore the mainstay of treatment. While from the late 1970s, the intravenous route of administration was the most common, in the past decades, subcutaneous immunoglobulin replacement therapy has become more popular among patients and physicians. Independently of the optimal route of administration, dosage and IgG trough level remain subjects of debate. Higher IgG trough levels seem to improve the protection against recurrent infections and thus better prevent complications such as bronchiectasis. Some patients, however, achieve protection with IgG trough levels on the lower IgG limit of healthy persons. Therefore, an individual protective IgG trough level needs to be defined for each patient. Use of additional prophylactic antibiotics and immunosuppressive drugs differs amongst specialized immunodeficiency centres and clearly requires future investigation in multi-centre trials. Haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) is to date indicated as curative treatment in certain patients with B-cell defects associated with cell deficiencies, for example in two class-switch recombination defects and in selected severe forms of common variable immunodeficiency.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available