4.5 Article

Is perceived social distance between the patient and the general practitioner related to their disagreement on patient's health status?

Journal

PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING
Volume 91, Issue 1, Pages 97-104

Publisher

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2012.11.012

Keywords

Primary care; Health inequalities; Patient/physician interaction; Self-rated health; Perceived social distance

Funding

  1. Institut de Recherche en Sante Publique (IReSP)
  2. University Hospital of Toulouse

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective: To ascertain whether disagreement between patients and general practitioners (GP) on the patient's health status varies according to their respective perceived social distance (PSD). Methods: The analysis used the Intermede project's quantitative data collected from 585 patients and 27 doctors via mirrored questionnaires. GPs and patients ranked their own perceived social position (PSP) in society, and their patients' and their GP respectively. PSD was calculated as the PSP's subtraction from the patients' and GPs' assessments.. Results: Disagreement between GPs and patients regarding the patient's health status was associated with PSD by the GP whereas it was not associated with PSD by the patient. In the multilevel analysis, disagreement whereby GPs overestimate patient's health status increased within PSD by the GP: OR:2.9 (95%CI = 1.0-8.6, p = 0.055) for low PSD, OR:3.4 (95%CI = 1.1-10.2, p < 0.05) for moderate PSD and OR:3.8 (95%CI = 1.1-13.1, p < 0.05) for high PSD (reference: no distance). Conclusions: Patients perceived with a lower social position by their GP and who consider themselves to have poor health are less likely to be identified in the primary care system. Practice implications: Physicians need to be conscious that their own perception influences the quality of the interaction with their patients, potentially resulting in unequal health care trajectories. (C) 2012 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available