4.5 Article

Ethnic and gender differences in patient education about heart disease risk and prevention

Journal

PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING
Volume 76, Issue 2, Pages 181-188

Publisher

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2008.12.026

Keywords

Heart disease; Gender; Ethnic groups; Patient education; Physician-patient relations

Funding

  1. Canadian Institutes of Health Research [MOP-53065]
  2. Michael Smith Foundation for Health Research (MSFHR)
  3. GENESIS

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective: To investigate whether there are gender and ethnic disparities in the patient education provided by primary healthcare providers about heart disease (HD) risk and prevention. Methods: A telephone survey, conducted in four languages, was completed by 976 people, 40+ years of age, in Metro Vancouver, Canada. Questions assessing communication with healthcare providers' provision of HD risk and management education were the focus. Results: Statistically significant gender and ethnic differences were found. Women were less likely to report discussing HID risk and management with their healthcare providers. Chinese-Canadian participants had less likelihood of receiving HD education compared with participants of other ethnic origins. These differences persisted after multivariate adjustment with income, highest level of education attained, age, and other factors. Conclusion: Primary healthcare providers should make improved efforts towards education about HID and its risk factors for women in general, and for postmenopausal women especially. Practice implications: Healthcare providers should be aware that some ethnic populations may not be receiving patient education similar to that received by people of other communities, as found for Chinese-Canadian members of this study community. Further understanding of the barriers faced by ethnic groups must be gained to develop solutions. (C) 2009 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available