4.5 Article

MCM2/TOP2A (ProExC) immunohistochemistry as a predictive marker in head and neck mucosal biopsies

Journal

PATHOLOGY RESEARCH AND PRACTICE
Volume 210, Issue 6, Pages 346-350

Publisher

ELSEVIER GMBH
DOI: 10.1016/j.prp.2014.02.003

Keywords

lmmunohistochemisty; ProExC; Head and Neck; Biopsy interpretation; Dysplasia

Categories

Funding

  1. FIC NIH HHS [D43 TW000018] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NCI NIH HHS [P30 CA023108] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Mucosal biopsies from the head and neck are often small and poorly oriented, which impedes diagnostic interpretation, especially in patients with a history of cancer, being monitored for recurrence. A cocktail of antibodies targeted against DNA topoisomerase IIA and mini-chromosome maintenance protein 2 (MCM2/TOP2A, ProExC), markers of aberrant S-phase induction, have been used with success as a diagnostic adjunct in the evaluation of squamous dysplasia of the uterine cervix. We tested the utility in. head and neck biopsies to see if ProExC could be used to discriminate reactive/inflammatory from true pre-neoplasia. Sixty-four archival biopsies were selected from patients who presented to the surgeon with an indication for biopsy to rule out dysplasia. Histologically, all biopsies showed nonspecific atypia that was difficult to discriminate from dysplasia. Twenty-three of the patients progressed to squamous carcinoma and the rest remained benign over five years follow-up. Cases stained with ProExC by IHC methods showed a significant pattern of expression (p = 0.026). The staining was greatest in patients without a history of prior head and neck cancer but was not significant. Our results show that ProExC, used in conjunction with the H&E slide, can enhance the predictive power of a mucosal biopsy in a cohort of patients. (C) 2014 Elsevier GmbH. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available