4.5 Article

Pediatric extra-renal rhabdoid tumors with unusual morphology: A diagnostic pitfall for small biopsies

Journal

PATHOLOGY RESEARCH AND PRACTICE
Volume 205, Issue 7, Pages 451-457

Publisher

ELSEVIER GMBH, URBAN & FISCHER VERLAG
DOI: 10.1016/j.prp.2009.01.003

Keywords

Rhabdoid tumor; Pediatric; Unusual morphology; hSNF5/SMARCB1; INI1 protein

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The diagnosis of malignant rhabdoid tumor (MRT) is straightforward if the typical, large eosinophilic rhabdoid cells are identified. We report on two diagnostically challenging cases of pediatric extra-renal MRTs which, when evaluated at incisional biopsy, were composed exclusively of small- to medium-sized round cells with focal spindling, lacking rhabdoid phenotype. This morphology, along with a polyphenotypic immunoprofile, including the expression of vimentin/CD99/cytokeratins/alpha-smooth muscle actin and vimentin/CD99/S-100 protein in case I and case 2, respectively, suggested the possibility of Ewing sarcoma (EWS)/PNET. However, molecular analyses failed to show the presence of the EWS/FLI-1 and EWS/ERG fusion transcripts, indicative of the most common translocations, i.e., t(11;22)(q24;q12) and t(22;21)(q22;q12), occurring in this tumor family. The revision of both cases included an immunohistochemical analysis with a commercially available anti-INI1 protein antibody. Immunohistochemistry, showing the absence of INI1 expression in neoplastic cells, strongly supported the diagnosis of MRT. Ultrastructural studies, performed on formalin-fixed tissues, were consistent with the diagnosis of MRT. This study suggests including anti-INI1 protein antibody in the immunohistochemical panel when evaluating pediatric tumors with ambiguous morphological and immunohistochemical features, particularly from small biopsies. A careful evaluation of clinical, pathological, and molecular findings is the key to a correct diagnostic approach of pediatric tumors. (C) 2009 Elsevier GmbH. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available