4.5 Article

SOCS-3 is associated with vascular invasion and overall survival in hepatocellular carcinoma

Journal

PATHOLOGY
Volume 40, Issue 6, Pages 558-563

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1080/00313020802320432

Keywords

SOCS-3; hepatocellular carcinoma; vascular invasion; survival

Categories

Funding

  1. Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital-Kaohsiung, Taiwan [93-KMUH-007]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Aims: Alteration of the suppressor of cytokine signalling-3 (SOCS-3) has been observed in certain human cancers. However, the clinical role of this short-lived protein in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is not well established. Therefore, we aimed to explore the potential role of SOCS-3 proteins in HCC. Methods: Paraffin embedded sections from 87 HCC patients were included in this study. The expression patterns of SOCS-3 proteins were analysed using immunohistochemistry and the results were correlated with clinicopathological characteristics and overall survival of the HCC patients. Results: The SOCS-3 expression of HCC lesions and the adjacent non-tumourous liver tissues was significantly correlated (p = 0.035), while the SOCS-3 expression in HCC lesions was significantly and positively correlated with vascular invasion and histological grading (p = 0.034 and 0.032, respectively). The Kaplan-Meier survival curve showed that the HCC patients with high SOCS-3 expression were associated with a poor overall survival rate in the HCC subgroup with positive vascular invasion (p = 0.014). Furthermore, a multivariate Cox regression model showed that SOCS-3 expression was also a significant determinant of the overall survival for HCC (p = 0.006). Conclusions: Our results indicate that altered SOCS-3 expression is associated with the overall survival in a subset of HCC patients with positive vascular invasion. Constitutive and altered SOCS-3 expression may have potential roles in a subset of HCC patients.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available