4.5 Article

Hippocampal atrophy predicts conversion to dementia after STN-DBS in Parkinson's disease

Journal

PARKINSONISM & RELATED DISORDERS
Volume 15, Issue 7, Pages 521-524

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.parkreldis.2009.01.003

Keywords

Hippocampus; Volumetric MRI; Parkinson's disease dementia; Deep brain stimulation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Hippocampal atrophy (HA) is a known predictor of dementia in Alzheimer's disease. HA has been found in advanced Parkinson's disease (PD), but no predicting value has been demonstrated yet. The identification of such a predictor in candidates for subthalamic deep brain stimulation (STN-DBS) would be of value. Our objective was to compare preoperative hippocampal volumes (HV) between PD patients who subsequently converted to dementia (PDD) after STN-DBS and those who did not (PDnD). Methods: From a cohort of 70 consecutive STN-DBS treated PD patients, 14 converted to dementia over 25.6 +/- 20.2 months (PDD). They were compared to 14 matched controls (PDnD) who did not convert to dementia after 43.9 +/- 11.7 months. On the preoperative 3D MPRAGE MRI images, HV and total brain volumes (TBV) were measured by a blinded investigator using manual and automatic segmentation respectively. Results: PDD had smaller preoperative HV than PDnD (1.95 +/- 0.29 ml; 2.28 +/- 0.33 ml: p < 0.01). This difference reinforced after normalization for TBV (3.28 +/- 0.48, 3.93 +/- 0.60; p < 0.01). Every 0.1 ml decrease of HV increased the likelihood to develop dementia by 24.6%. A large overlap was found between PD and PDnD HVs, precluding the identification of a cut-off score. Conclusions: As in Alzheimer's disease, HA may be a predictor of the conversion to dementia in PD. This preoperative predictor suggests that the development of dementia after STN-DBS is related to the disease progression, rather then the procedure. Further studies are needed to define a cut-off score for HA, in order to affine its predictive value for an individual patient. (C) 2009 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available