4.3 Article

Molecular identification of Echinococcus species from eastern and southern Qinghai, China, based on the mitochondrial cox1 gene

Journal

PARASITOLOGY RESEARCH
Volume 111, Issue 1, Pages 179-184

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00436-012-2815-z

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. Science and Technology Plan of Qinghai Province [2010-Z-742]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31101628]
  3. West Light Foundation of The Chinese Academy of Sciences
  4. Japan Society for the Promotion of Science

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau (QTP, in western China), which is the largest and highest plateau on Earth, is a highly epidemic region for Echinococcus spp. We collected 70 Echinococcus samples from humans, dogs, sheep, yaks, plateau pikas, and voles in eastern and southern Qinghai and genotyped them using the mitochondrial DNA marker cytochrome oxidase subunit I gene and maximum parsimony and Bayesian reconstruction methods. Based on the 792-bp sequence matrix, we recorded 124 variable sites, of which, 115 were parsimony-informative. Thirty-four haplotypes (H1-H34) were detected, of which H1-H15, H16-H17, and H18-H34 belonged to Echinococcus shiquicus, Echinococcus multilocularis, and Echinococcus granulosus, respectively. Within 26 human isolates, three were identified as E. multilocularis and 23 were E. granulosus. We also detected a dual infection case in a dog with E. multilocularis and E. granulosus. The intraspecific haplotype (Hd +/- SD) and nucleotide (Nd +/- SD) diversity of E. shiquicus (0.947 +/- 0.021; 0.00441 +/- 0.00062) was higher than that for E. granulosus (0.896 +/- 0.038; 0.00221 +/- 0.00031) and E. multilocularis (0.286 +/- 0.196; 0.00036 +/- 0.00025). Moreover, the haplotype network of E. shiquicus showed a radial feature rather than a divergent feature in a previous study, indicating this species in the QTP has also evolved with bottleneck effects.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available