4.4 Article

Phenotypic variation in a significant spore character in Kudoa (Myxosporea: Multivalvulida) species infecting brain tissue

Journal

PARASITOLOGY
Volume 137, Issue 12, Pages 1759-1772

Publisher

CAMBRIDGE UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1017/S0031182010000673

Keywords

Myxozoa; Kudoidae; Kudoa yasunagai; Kudoa neurophila; phenotypic variation; morphotypes; morphometrics

Categories

Funding

  1. ARC/NHMRC Research Network for Parasitology
  2. Australian Biological Resource Study (ABRS)
  3. BHP Billiton
  4. Great Barrier Reef Foundation
  5. Australian Institute of Marine Science
  6. Alfred P. Sloan Foundation [209/29]
  7. Australian node of the CReefs global research initiative

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Some Kudoa species display variations in the number of polar capsules in spores within an individual pseudocyst. Nonetheless, there is usually a dominant morphotype which forms a significant element of diagnosis. In 2007, a Kudoa isolate from whiting (spores with 5 (dominant) or 6 (minor) polar capsules) was characterized by Burger et al. (2007) as being 100% identical in SSU rDNA to Kudoa yasunagai (spores with 7 polar capsules) from a halibut, despite its obvious morphological differences. The authors hypothesized that either SSU rDNA had reached its level of resolution or that the genetic identity revealed conspecificity. To further investigate these hypotheses, SSU and LSU rDNA sequence data were coupled with principal components, correlation, and regression analyses of morphometric data from different kudoid isolates that infect brain tissue to determine the relationships between spore morphotypes and different kudoid isolates. The trends in morphometrics between the spores of particular isolates were so similar that it was concluded that the molecular results did indicate conspecificity rather than SSU reaching its level of resolution. This phenotypic influence on a significant diagnostic character within the Kudoidae has a major impact on the diagnosis of this, and potentially other, pathogenic species.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available