4.3 Article

Galβ1-6Gal, antigenic epitope which accounts for serological cross-reaction in diagnosis of Echinococcus multilocularis infection

Journal

PARASITE IMMUNOLOGY
Volume 31, Issue 8, Pages 481-487

Publisher

WILEY-BLACKWELL PUBLISHING, INC
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-3024.2009.01129.x

Keywords

antigenic epitope; Echinococcus multilocularis; neogala-series glycolipid; serological cross-reactivity; terminal-Gal beta 1-6Gal

Ask authors/readers for more resources

P>Parasitic helminths express various antigenic carbohydrates, which often account for serological cross-reactions. In serodiagnosis, it is essential to inspect cross-reactivity between the target parasite and other parasites in order to assess diagnostic performance. Our previous study showed that the Gal beta 1-6Gal sequence was a common epitope between Echinococcus multilocularis (Em) and E. granulosus (Eg). Furthermore, compounds with this sequence from Fasciola hepatica (Fh) reportedly were recognized by sera with Eg infection. Our aim is to investigate whether this sequence is one of the widely common epitopes in many kinds of parasites. For various parasites, sera with Fh infection cross-reacted at the highest frequency (71 center dot 4%) against Em antigen. In patients with other parasitic infections, sera showed cross-reactions against Fh antigen bound to Em antigen with a high frequency (23 center dot 7%). Binding inhibition tests with commercial Gal beta 1-6Gal disaccharide showed that Gal beta 1-6Gal was the common epitope between not only Em, Eg and Fh, but also between various other parasites. Furthermore, the presence of the Gal beta 1-6Gal epitope in Em antigen was confirmed by immunoblot testing with the specific antibody for this sequence. This study showed that the Gal beta 1-6Gal sequence is one of the antigenic epitopes that accounts for serological cross-reactivity between Em and various other parasites.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available