4.0 Article

Genetic Diversity and Population Structure of Pronghorn Spiny Lobster Panulirus penicillatus in the Pacific Region

Journal

PACIFIC SCIENCE
Volume 68, Issue 2, Pages 197-211

Publisher

UNIV HAWAII PRESS
DOI: 10.2984/68.2.3

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. University of the Ryukyus Grants for International Research
  2. Sasagawa Scientific Research Grant from the Japan Science Society
  3. Elucidation of the Life History and Genetic Population Structure for Important Fisheries Fishes from the Okinawa Prefectural Government

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Adult specimens of Panulirus penicillatus were collected from localities distributed in Japan: Hachijojima Island, Ryukyu Archipelago (Amamioshima, Okinawajima, Ishigakijima); Taiwan: Taitung; Indonesia: Java Sea and Gebe Island; French Polynesia: Moorea Island; and Ecuador: Isabela Island. Phyllosoma larval specimens were collected from the western sea of the Galapagos Islands. In total, 569-570 nucleotide sequences were analyzed from the mtDNA control region of 480 individuals. Almost all individuals had a unique haplotype. Intrapopulation haplotype (h) and nucleotide (g) diversities were high for each locality, ranging h = 0.9996-1.0000 and pi= 0.0255-0.0448. A mismatch distribution of pairwise differences between haplotypes indicated that P. penicillatus does not fit the sudden population expansion model. Analysis of molecular variance (AMOVA) shows a clear genetic difference between two regions (western/central Pacific and eastern Pacific). High gene flow was found within localities in the western/central Pacific region, probably resulting from an extended planktonic larval stage and prevailing ocean currents. In this study we detected genetic structure between eastern Pacific populations and western Pacific populations, indicating that despite the nearly 1-yr larval period for this species, larvae generally do not pass over the East Pacific Barrier.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.0
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available