4.1 Article

Superior type of atypical AV nodal reentrant tachycardia: Incidence, characteristics, and effect of slow pathway ablation

Journal

PACE-PACING AND CLINICAL ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY
Volume 31, Issue 8, Pages 998-1009

Publisher

BLACKWELL PUBLISHING
DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.2008.01127.x

Keywords

atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia; superior type; electrophysiology; catheter ablation; slow pathway

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Atypical atrioventricular (AV) nodal reentrant tachycardias (AVNRT) usually exhibit the earliest retrograde atrial activation (ERAA) at the right inferoseptum (Rt-IS) or proximal coronary sinus (PCS). The purpose of this study was to characterize atypical AVNRT with the ERAA at the right superoseptum (Rt-SS). Methods: Seventy-three atypical AVNRTs induced in 63 cases were classified into the superior type with the ERAA at the Rt-SS and inferior type with the ERAA at the Rt-IS or PCS. Results: There were nine superior (12%) and 64 inferior types of atypical AVNRT (88%) in seven and 56 cases, respectively. The superior type exhibited a short atrial-His interval during the tachycardia (166 +/- 41 ms), long His-atrial interval during the tachycardia (H-At:156 +/- 38 ms), and ventricular pacing at the tachycardia cycle length (TCL) (H-AP:201 +/- 36 ms), and evidence for a lower common pathway, including second-degree AV block (four tachycardias) and an H-Ap being longer than the H-At (nine tachycardias). The TCL was shorter in the superior type than in the inferior type (322 +/- 35 vs 404 +/- 110 ms; P < 0.02). In the inferior type, all tachycardias were eliminated after the ablation at the Rt-IS (44 tachycardias) or PCS (20 tachycardias) where an ERAA was recorded. In the superior type, ablation at the Rt-IS was ineffective; however, ablation at the right midseptum eliminated seven (78%) of the nine tachycardias. Conclusions: The tachycardia circuit of the superior type might have deviated to a more superior part of Koch's triangle than that of the inferior type.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available