Journal
PACE-PACING AND CLINICAL ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY
Volume 31, Issue 2, Pages 151-158Publisher
WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.2007.00962.x
Keywords
implantable defibrillator; interference; transcutaneous electrical stimulation
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Background: The use of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS)for pain relief is increasing. At the same time the implantable cardioverter defibrillator (IGD) is a routine treatment for malignant tachyarrhythmias. Today patients often need devices for more than one condition, and consideration must be given to the interaction between them. We studied the risk of interference between TENS and the ICD function. Methods and Results: Thirty patients who had received an ICD underwent a test protocol including TENS at the mammilla and hip levels, at two energy levels, and at the highest comfortable stimulation level. The effects of TENS on the electrocardiogram lead II, intracardiac electrograms, and the ICD marker channels were analyzed. Disturbance from TENS on the sensing function was seen at all stimulation attempts. Interference between the systems was observed in 16 patients. In eight patients (27%) the interpretation was VT/VF and in 14 patients (47%) as ventricular premature extra beats. Other kinds of interactions were seen in five patients (16%). Each patient could have more than one kind of interference. Conclusions: Noise reversion and undersensing might prevent the ICD from delivering shock when it should and the interpretation as VT/VF could result in inappropriate shocks. Because of the potentially serious consequences of interference we do not recommend the use of TENS in patients with ICD.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available