4.2 Article

Generalized Arteriosclerosis and Changes of the Cochlea in Young Adults

Journal

OTOLOGY & NEUROTOLOGY
Volume 29, Issue 8, Pages 1193-1197

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/MAO.0b013e31818a0906

Keywords

Arteriosclerosis; Cochlea; Human temporal bone

Funding

  1. International Hearing Foundation
  2. Starkey Foundation
  3. Hubbard Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Hypothesis: To disclose the histopathologic findings of the cochlea in young adults with generalized arteriosclerosis. Background: It is well known that arteriosclerosis begins and progresses during childhood. Although the relationship between arteriosclerosis and auditory function in elderly people was examined in many reports, the histopathologic effect of arteriosclerosis on the cochlea in young adults has not been studied. Methods: This study involved quantitative analysis, including the number of spiral ganglion cells, the loss of cochlear Outer hair cells, and the areas of stria vascularis and spiral ligament. It included 10 temporal bones from 6 subjects with generalized arteriosclerosis and 10 age-matched normal control temporal bones from 7 subjects. Results: The mean number of spiral ganglion cells in the cochlea with generalized arteriosclerosis was significantly lower than that in normal controls in the basal turn. The mean loss of outer hair cells in the cochlea with generalized arteriosclerosis was significantly greater than that of normal controls in the basal and apical turns. The stria vascularis and spiral ligament were severely atrophic, with generalized arteriosclerosis in the basal turn. There was no significant difference in the thickness of the spiral modiolar artery between generalized arteriosclerosis and normal controls. Conclusion: Degeneration of the cochlea, especially in the basal turn, was already apparent in young adults with generalized arteriosclerosis.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available