4.5 Article

Patients reject the concept of fragility fracture-a new understanding based on fracture patients' communication

Journal

OSTEOPOROSIS INTERNATIONAL
Volume 23, Issue 12, Pages 2829-2834

Publisher

SPRINGER LONDON LTD
DOI: 10.1007/s00198-012-1914-0

Keywords

Communication; Fragility fracture; Osteoporosis; Patient perspective; Qualitative research

Funding

  1. Canadian Institutes of Health Research [CGA-86802]
  2. Ontario Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care (MOHLTC)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We examined patients' communication about fragility fractures to gain insight into why patients do not connect fractures to bone health. The term fragility fracture was a misnomer to patients who perceived the event as physically and emotionally traumatic. Improved communication about such fractures could facilitate awareness of bone health. We examined patients' communication about fragility fractures to gain insight into why patients do not perceive the connection between their fracture and low bone mass. A descriptive phenomenological (qualitative) study was conducted. During face-to-face interviews, the participants described the experience of their fracture in detail and the circumstances surrounding the fracture. Data analysis was guided by Giorgi's methodology. English-speaking male and female patients aged 65+ years and high risk for future fracture were eligible and screened for osteoporosis through an established screening program at an urban teaching hospital. We recruited 30 participants (9 males, 21 females), aged 65-88, who presented with a hip (n = 11), wrist (n = 11), shoulder (n = 6), or other (n = 2) fracture. Ten of the 30 fractures occurred inside the home and the remaining fractures occurred outside the home. Sustaining a fragility fracture was perceived as a traumatic event, both physically and emotionally. In general, participants used forceful, action-oriented words and referred to hard surfaces to describe the experience. Explanations for the fracture, other than bone quality, were often reported, especially that falls were freak or fluke events. Patients who sustained a fracture under more mundane circumstances seemed more likely to perceive a connection between the fracture and their bone health. The term fragility fracture was a misnomer for many older adults. By reexamining how this term is communicated to fracture patients, health care providers may better facilitate patients' awareness of bone health.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available