4.5 Article

Changes in 25-Hydroxyvitamin D3 to oral treatment with vitamin D3 in postmenopausal females with osteoporosis

Journal

OSTEOPOROSIS INTERNATIONAL
Volume 20, Issue 8, Pages 1329-1335

Publisher

SPRINGER LONDON LTD
DOI: 10.1007/s00198-008-0790-0

Keywords

Cholecalciferol; Female; 25-hydroxyvitamin D; Osteoporosis; Postmenopausal; Vitamin D

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study reports on oral treatment with different doses of vitamin D3 ranging from 25 to 200 A mu g in females with 25-hydroxyvitamin D3 levels < 60 nmol/L screened for participation in an osteoporosis trial. A guidance to safely and efficiently achieve 25-hydroxyvitamin D3 levels > 60 nmol/L is presented. The importance of vitamin D for skeletal health has been implemented in clinical trials in osteoporosis. The threshold of 25-hydroxyvitamin D for inclusion has changed from 30 to 60 nmol/L. This study reports on oral treatment with different doses of vitamin D3 in females with 25-hydroxyvitamin D3 levels < 60 nmol/L. In 131 postmenopausal females screened for participation in an osteoporosis trial, the 25-hydroxyvitamin D3 concentration was < 60 nmol/L. They were treated with 25 (n = 22), 50 (n = 19), 75 (n = 19), 100 (n = 41) or 200 mu g (n = 30) of vitamin D3 daily for at least 10 days. In the females treated with 25, 50, 75, 100 and 200 mu g of vitamin D3 daily the 25-hydroxyvitamin D3 concentrations increased significantly from 32.4 +/- 2.7 (mean +/- SEM) to 50.8 +/- 2.9, from 46.7 +/- 2.8 to 65.8 +/- 2.6, from 41.6 +/- 2.7 to 67.4 +/- 2.9, from 46.7 +/- 1.4 to 64.4 +/- 2.2 and from 42.1 +/- 2.0 to 71.2 +/- 2.8 nmol/L, respectively (p < 0.001). S-calcium increased significantly but within the reference range (p < 0.006). Oral vitamin D3 safely increased 25-hydroxyvitamin D3 concentrations in all females above 60 nmol/L. This study demonstrates how to achieve the new recommended 25-hydroxyvitamin D concentrations within the screening period of a clinical trial.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available