4.3 Article

Conflicting management policies for the Arabian wolf Canis lupus arabs in the Negev Desert: is this justified?

Journal

ORYX
Volume 47, Issue 2, Pages 228-236

Publisher

CAMBRIDGE UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1017/S0030605311001797

Keywords

Carnivore removal; Israel; Middle East; non-invasive sampling; population size; population subdivision; scatology

Funding

  1. Israel Nature and Parks Authority

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Conservation plans may conflict when both predator and prey in the same ecological system are threatened species. In this study we present a problematic case of conflicting conservation policies involving the Arabian wolf Canis lupus arabs and two species of gazelles (Gazella gazella acaciae and Gazella dorcas), all of which are threatened in Israel. By studying genetic subdivision using faecal DNA we evaluated the policy of treating the Arabian wolves in the Negev Desert as two separate populations. We analysed 95 wolf faecal samples from 12 feeding sites C. 20 km apart. Network analysis and Bayesian clustering were used for separating populations. Mark recapture design, rarefaction and an urn model were applied to estimate wolf population size. We found that wolves in the central and southern Negev cannot be genetically separated, and their density is similar in both regions. Our results provide a better baseline for a unified management of wolves in the Negev. We call for the consideration of other factors influencing gazelle population size before adopting drastic measures such as wolf removal.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available