4.6 Article

High-performance polymer light emitting diodes with interface-engineered graphene anodes

Journal

ORGANIC ELECTRONICS
Volume 14, Issue 9, Pages 2324-2330

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.orgel.2013.05.033

Keywords

Polymer light emitting diodes (PLEDs); Graphene; Transfer length method (TLM); Work function; Chemical vapor deposition (CVD)

Funding

  1. OLED center of Samsung Display and Seoul National University
  2. Industrial Strategic Technology Development Program (Development of Fundamental Technologies for Flexible Combined-Function Organic Electronic Device) [KI002104]
  3. Global Research Lab (GRL) Program [2011-0021972]
  4. Global Frontier Research Program [2011-0031627]
  5. Basic Science Research Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) [2012M3A7B4049807, 2011-0017587, 2009-0083540]
  6. Korean government (MEST)
  7. Korean government (MKE)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Recently, graphene-based organic light emitting diodes (OLEDs) were successfully demonstrated using graphene as anodes. However, the graphene electrodes have not been utilized for polymer light emitting diodes (PLEDs) yet, although the simpler device structure and the solution-based fabrication process of PLEDs are expected to be more advantageous in terms of time and cost. Here we demonstrate high-performance polymer light emitting diodes (PLEDs) with simple two-layer structures using interface-engineered single-layer graphene films as anodes. The single-layer graphene synthesized by chemical vapor deposition methods was transferred onto a glass substrate utilizing an elastic stamp, and its work function was engineered by varying the duration and the power of ultraviolet ozone (UVO) treatment. Thus, we were able to optimize the contact between silver electrodes and the graphene anodes, leading to the considerable enhancement of light-emitting performance. (C) 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available