4.6 Article

The benefit of pretreatment esophageal screening with image-enhanced endoscopy on the survival of patients with hypopharyngeal cancer

Journal

ORAL ONCOLOGY
Volume 49, Issue 8, Pages 808-813

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2013.04.009

Keywords

Hypopharyngeal cancer; Synchronous neoplasms; Esophageal cancer; Survival; Image-enhanced endoscopy

Funding

  1. National Science Council [NSC96-2314-B-002-092-MY3]
  2. E-Da Hospital [EDAHP98022]
  3. Taipei Institute of Pathology

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Synchronous esophageal cancers can suppress the survival of patients with hypopharyngeal cancers. Esophageal screening with the image-enhanced endoscopy may identify more synchronous cancers while there is no evidence to support its benefit on survival. Methods: A total of 281 and 320 patients were diagnosed with hypopharyngeal cancer before and after the policy of routine esophageal screening. Primary outcome measures were overall survival. Results: Among those who received screening, 49 patients (49/180, 27.2%) had synchronous esophageal cancers; treatment planning was changed in 42 (23.3%). Before and after the policy, percentages of stage I-II synchronous cancers were 20% (3/15) and 53.1% (26/49), respectively. Adjunctive therapies for synchronous cancers have led to a better survival after the policy than before (P = 0.002). The Cox regression model quantified a survival benefit of 29% (95% CI: 11-43%) when adjusting for TNM stage of hypopharyngeal cancer. In post-policy period, the survival was better for those who chose screening than those who did not (HR: 0.57, 95% CI: 0.41-0.79). Among those without screening, there was no difference between the pre- and post-policy periods (HR: 0.96, 95% CI: 0.74-1.26). Conclusions: Patients with hypopharyngeal cancers may benefit from the esophageal screening with image-enhanced endoscopy through the better detection of early-stage synchronous cancers. (C) 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available