4.6 Article

Prognostic value of tissue polypeptide antigen in oral squamous cell carcinoma

Journal

ORAL ONCOLOGY
Volume 47, Issue 2, Pages 114-120

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2010.11.005

Keywords

Oral cancer; Squamous cell carcinoma; Cytokeratins; Serum tumour markers; Tissue polypeptide antigen; Prognosis

Funding

  1. Tata Memorial Centre, IRG [371]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Human oral cancer has a high risk of locoregional relapse which is difficult to diagnose early due to lack of prognostic markers. We and others have shown aberrant expression of cytokeratin (CK) 8 and 18 in human oral cancer. Aberrant supra-basal expression of CK19 has been shown earlier. In this study, our aim was to develop a non-invasive test for prognostication of human oral cancer. Immunoradiometric assay (IRMA) was used to measure the circulating levels of TPA in the sera of 80 oral cancer patients before surgery and seven days after surgery. Elevated serum TPA levels were noted in the post surgery samples of 28 out of the 50 patients for whom clinical follow-up was available, as compared to their pre-surgery samples. TPA levels in the pre-surgery serum samples of patients were significantly higher than levels in the sera of healthy controls (p = 0.001). Elevated levels in patients correlated significantly with stage (p = 0.02), development of recurrence (p < 0.006), and impacted survival (p < 0.033). IHC analysis showed statistically significant correlation between expression of CK8, 18 and 19 in surrounding uninvolved tissues of the tumour and post surgery elevated serum TPA levels (p < 0.001). This suggests the possibility that CK fragments are released from the surrounding uninvolved tissues into the sera of patients after surgical removal of the tumour. Thus, our study indicates that TPA can be a useful tumour marker for the prediction of recurrence and poor prognosis in human oral cancer. (C) 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available